Skip to main content

Levitant v. Workers Compensation Board of the State of New York

S.D.N.Y.November 8, 2019No. 1:16-cv-06990
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationDiscrimination

Outcome

The court denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of a prior order granting defendants' motion to dismiss all claims. The court found plaintiff's arguments were either procedurally improper as new legal theories raised for the first time on reconsideration, or without merit on the substance.

What This Ruling Means

**Levitant v. Workers Compensation Board of New York: What Workers Need to Know** **What Happened** An employee named Levitant filed a civil rights lawsuit against the New York State Workers Compensation Board in 2019. The Workers Compensation Board is the state agency that handles workplace injury claims and benefits for injured workers. While the specific details of Levitant's complaint aren't provided in the available information, the case involved allegations that the Board violated civil rights laws in how it handled the employee's situation. **What the Court Decided** The court's final decision in this case is not detailed in the available records. Without access to the complete ruling, it's unclear whether the court sided with the employee or the Workers Compensation Board. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights that workers can potentially file civil rights claims against state workers' compensation agencies if they believe they've been treated unfairly or discriminated against during the claims process. Workers have legal protections beyond just workers' compensation benefits - they may also have civil rights remedies available if government agencies violate federal or state anti-discrimination laws while handling their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.