Skip to main content

Zhang v. Osaka Steakhouse & Sushi, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.December 2, 2019No. 1:18-cv-08659
Plaintiff WinSkeeters and Skeeters$96,580 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

Jury verdict awarded plaintiff $96,580 in damages for injuries sustained while working on defendants' rock crusher equipment due to inadequate safety guards and failure to comply with Oregon Employers' Liability Law and Basic Safety Code.

What This Ruling Means

**Restaurant Worker Wins Lawsuit After Injury from Unsafe Equipment** This case involved a worker named Zhang who was injured while working at Osaka Steakhouse & Sushi. Zhang was hurt while using rock crusher equipment that didn't have proper safety guards. The injury was serious enough that Zhang sued the restaurant for not providing safe working conditions. A jury sided with Zhang and awarded $96,580 in total damages. This included $81,000 for general damages (likely pain and suffering) and $15,580 for special damages (probably medical bills and lost wages). The restaurant appealed the decision, arguing that Zhang's evidence wasn't strong enough and that Zhang was partly at fault for not wearing a hard hat. However, the appeals court upheld the jury's decision. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that employers have a legal duty to provide safe equipment and working conditions. Even if you might not follow every safety rule perfectly (like wearing all protective gear), your employer can still be held responsible when unsafe equipment causes injuries. Workers have the right to a reasonably safe workplace, and courts will enforce this protection.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.