Souffrant v. Grambro Realty Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties reached a settlement agreement whereby defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $32,000 in full settlement of his FLSA and New York Labor Law wage claims, with $10,666.66 allocated to plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., subject to reformation of the mutual release clauses to limit their scope to claims arising from actions taken in the parties' capacities as such.
What This Ruling Means
Souffrant v. Grambro Realty Corp. Summary
What Happened
An employee named Souffrant accused Grambro Realty Corp. of wage theft—failing to pay him wages he earned. He filed a lawsuit under federal and New York state wage laws.
What the Court Decided
The parties agreed to settle the case rather than go to trial. Grambro Realty agreed to pay Souffrant $32,000 to resolve his wage claims. His attorney received $10,666.66 from this amount to cover legal fees and costs. A judge approved the settlement, finding it fair and reasonable. The agreement also included a mutual release, though the court limited its scope to prevent the employer from using it to avoid other potential claims.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employees can successfully challenge wage theft through lawsuits. Settlements like this one can result in significant compensation. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you properly, you may have legal options—and you can potentially recover back wages plus attorney fees. Courts will evaluate whether settlement amounts are fair to workers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.