Skip to main content

Chang v. Philips Bryant Park LLC.

S.D.N.Y.June 5, 2020No. 1:17-cv-08816
Plaintiff WinPhilips Bryant Park LLC$150,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs for wage theft, awarding back pay and penalties.

What This Ruling Means

**Chang v. Philips Bryant Park LLC: Wage Theft Case** This case involved a dispute between an employee named Chang and Philips Bryant Park LLC over unpaid wages. Chang claimed that the company violated wage and hour laws, specifically alleging wage theft and violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. The court records don't provide enough detail to determine how this case was resolved or what the final outcome was. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in June 2020, but the final decision and any damages awarded are not reported in the available information. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the outcome, this case highlights important rights that all workers have. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees from wage theft - when employers fail to pay proper wages or overtime. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage laws can file lawsuits in federal court to recover unpaid wages. If you're experiencing wage theft, you have legal options available, and courts take these violations seriously under federal employment law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.