Gao v. Lucky Brother Inc
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement under which plaintiffs recovered $240,000 total ($91,759.33 to Gao and $65,090.93 to He) for unpaid minimum and overtime wages, plus $78,839.63 in attorney's fees and $3,481.11 in costs. The defendants denied liability but agreed to settle to avoid litigation risks.
What This Ruling Means
Gao v. Lucky Brother Inc Settlement
What Happened
Workers at Lucky Brother Inc filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to pay them the minimum wage and overtime pay they earned. Two employees, Gao and He, alleged they were not properly compensated for the hours they worked.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement in June 2020. Lucky Brother Inc agreed to pay $240,000 in total damages to the workers, with Gao receiving $91,759.33 and He receiving $65,090.93. The company also paid $78,839.63 in attorney's fees and $3,481.11 in court costs. Although the company denied wrongdoing, it chose to settle rather than continue the lawsuit.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that employees can successfully recover unpaid wages through lawsuits. Workers who believe they haven't been paid fairly have legal options available to them. The settlement demonstrates that companies may choose to compensate workers to avoid the expense and uncertainty of going to trial, even when they dispute the claims. If you suspect wage theft, speaking with an employment lawyer about your situation may be worthwhile.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.