Skip to main content

Lively v. WAFRA Investment Advisory Group, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.July 17, 2020No. 1:19-cv-03257
Defendant WinWAFRA Investment Advisory Group, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHarassmentWrongful TerminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing plaintiff's age discrimination and retaliation claims under the ADEA and related state law claims. The court found that documentary evidence of plaintiff's sexual harassment and misconduct provided a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for termination that was not pretextual.

What This Ruling Means

Lively v. WAFRA Investment Advisory Group, Inc.

What Happened

An employee sued WAFRA Investment Advisory Group after being fired, claiming the company discriminated against them based on age and retaliated against them for complaining. The employee also claimed the company harassed them and wrongfully terminated their job in violation of their employment contract.

What the Court Decided

The court sided with the company. The judge dismissed the age discrimination and retaliation claims, finding that documentary evidence showed the employee engaged in sexual harassment and misconduct. The court concluded this legitimate business reason for firing the employee—not age discrimination—was the real cause of termination.

Why This Matters for Workers

This case highlights an important principle: employers can fire workers for documented misconduct, even if workers claim discrimination. However, workers should know that companies must provide honest, documented reasons for termination. If an employer claims misconduct but employees can prove the real reason was age or another protected characteristic, they may still win. Workers should keep records of all workplace complaints and communications to protect themselves.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.