No specific laws identified for this ruling.
After default judgment on liability, the court adopted the magistrate judge's damages recommendation with minor modifications, awarding four plaintiffs a total of $167,772.15 in unpaid wages, pre-judgment interest, attorneys' fees, and costs against the restaurant employer.
Salazar v. 203 Lena Inc. - Employment Law Case Summary
This case involved a worker named Salazar who sued their employer, 203 Lena Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Salazar alleged that the employer failed to pay proper wages, which could include issues like unpaid overtime, being paid below minimum wage, or not receiving wages owed for work performed. The lawsuit was filed under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime requirements for most workers.
The court documents available do not show what the final decision was in this case or whether Salazar received any money as a result of the lawsuit.
Why This Matters for Workers:
This case highlights workers' rights to take legal action when employers don't follow wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees the ability to sue their employers in federal court when they believe they haven't been paid correctly. Even when we don't know the outcome, cases like this demonstrate that workers have legal options when facing potential wage theft or other pay-related violations by their employers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.