No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Settlement approved for $52,000 to resolve FLSA and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour claims brought by six former restaurant employees. Court awarded $9,658 in attorney's fees and costs from the settlement fund.
Restaurant Worker Sues Over Wage Violations
This case involved a worker named Cuizon who sued George & Frank's Japanese Noodle Restaurant for violating federal wage and hour laws. The employee claimed the restaurant failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. These types of cases often involve issues like unpaid overtime, working off the clock, or not receiving proper minimum wage.
Unfortunately, the court documents available don't show what the final decision was in this case or whether the worker received any money in damages. The case was filed in federal court in New York in November 2020, but the outcome remains unclear from the available information.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that restaurant workers have legal rights under federal law when it comes to fair pay. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees from wage theft and ensures they receive proper compensation for their work. If workers believe their employer isn't paying them correctly, they can file lawsuits to seek unpaid wages and other remedies. Restaurant workers should keep detailed records of their hours worked and pay received.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Cuizon from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.