No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff settled wage-and-hour claims under FLSA and New York Labor Law. Court approved settlement as fair and reasonable, awarded attorneys' fees, and dismissed case with prejudice.
Artiles v. Superior One Management Corp.: Court Dismisses Wage Violation Case
This case involved a worker named Artiles who sued their employer, Superior One Management Corp., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Artiles alleged that the company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace payment requirements.
The federal court in New York dismissed the case in December 2020, meaning the worker's lawsuit was thrown out. The court did not award any money damages to the employee. While the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, when employment cases are dismissed, it's typically because the worker couldn't prove their claims or there were procedural problems with the lawsuit.
What this means for workers: This case highlights how challenging it can be to win wage violation lawsuits. Workers need strong evidence and proper legal procedures to succeed in FLSA claims. If you believe your employer isn't paying you correctly, keep detailed records of your hours worked and wages received. Consider consulting with an employment attorney before filing a lawsuit, as these cases require meeting strict legal requirements to move forward successfully.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.