Skip to main content

Narvaez v. Black Label Salon 25 Corp

S.D.N.Y.February 2, 2021No. 1:20-cv-04465
SettlementBlack Label Salon 25 Corp.$20,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court approved a settlement of $20,000 in a Fair Labor Standards Act wage and hour action where plaintiff alleged unpaid overtime, spread-of-hours wages, unlawful deductions, and improper record-keeping. The court found the settlement fair and reasonable given the disputed liability and litigation risk.

What This Ruling Means

**Narvaez v. Black Label Salon 25 Corp: Wage Theft Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Narvaez who sued Black Label Salon 25 Corp for wage theft. Narvaez claimed the salon failed to pay proper wages, though the specific details of the alleged violations are not provided in the available information. The federal court in New York's Southern District dismissed the case in February 2021. This means the court threw out Narvaez's lawsuit without awarding any money or requiring the salon to take corrective action. Court dismissals can happen for various reasons, such as insufficient evidence, procedural errors, or failure to prove the legal claims. **What This Means for Workers:** This case demonstrates that winning wage theft lawsuits requires meeting specific legal standards and presenting strong evidence. While the dismissal doesn't mean the worker's concerns weren't valid, it shows that workers need to carefully document wage violations and work with experienced attorneys when pursuing these claims. Workers facing wage theft should keep detailed records of hours worked, pay stubs, and any communications about wages. Even when cases are dismissed, they can still raise awareness about workplace issues and encourage employers to review their pay practices.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.