Skip to main content

Ortiz Ortiz v. Abitino's Pizza 49th Street Corp.

S.D.N.Y.February 8, 2021No. 1:19-cv-07380
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the trial judge's relationship to the victim did not disqualify him from presiding over the case.

What This Ruling Means

I cannot provide a summary of the employment case Ortiz Ortiz v. Abitino's Pizza 49th Street Corp. based on the information provided. The excerpt indicates that the available text is actually from a criminal law case about a murder, not the employment wage theft case listed in the case details. Without access to the actual employment court documents, I cannot accurately explain what happened in the dispute between the worker and Abitino's Pizza, what the court decided, or what the outcome means for workers. To get reliable information about this wage theft case, you would need to: - Review the actual court documents from the Southern District of New York - Check the court's electronic filing system - Contact the clerk's office for case records - Consult with an employment attorney who can access the proper case files Employment law cases involving wage theft are important for workers to understand, but I can only provide accurate summaries when I have access to the correct legal documents from the specific case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.