No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court approved a settlement agreement between plaintiff Henry Santos and defendant YMY Management Corp. regarding unpaid wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. Plaintiff receives $23,019.33 after attorneys' fees of $11,509.67.
Santos v. YMY Management Corp. - Employment Law Ruling Summary
This case involved a worker named Santos who sued their employer, YMY Management Corp., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. Santos alleged that the company failed to properly pay wages according to these federal requirements.
The court dismissed Santos's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. When a case is dismissed, it typically means either the worker failed to prove their claims or there were legal problems with how the case was brought to court.
What This Means for Workers:
This ruling serves as a reminder that winning wage and hour cases requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage laws should carefully document their hours worked, pay received, and any workplace policies. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have important rights under the FLSA. If you suspect wage violations, consider consulting with an employment attorney who can evaluate whether you have a strong case before filing a lawsuit.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.