No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties reached a settlement on all issues in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The Court ordered the parties to submit either consent to magistrate judge proceedings, a voluntary dismissal, or a joint letter with the settlement terms for fairness review by April 1, 2021.
Illescas v. Four Green Fields LLC - Employment Law Case Summary
This case involved a worker named Illescas who sued their employer, Four Green Fields LLC, claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections. While the specific details of what went wrong aren't available, FLSA violations typically involve issues like not paying minimum wage, failing to pay overtime for hours worked over 40 per week, or misclassifying employees to avoid paying proper wages.
The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in March 2021. Unfortunately, the available information doesn't include the final court decision or whether any money was awarded to the worker.
What This Means for Workers:
This case represents the type of legal action workers can take when employers don't follow federal wage and hour laws. The FLSA gives employees the right to sue for unpaid wages, overtime, and other violations. Even when we don't know the outcome, these cases show that workers have legal options when employers fail to pay them properly according to federal standards.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.