Romero v. New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- motion to enforce
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Plaintiff Marcos Romero prevailed in his motion to enforce a court-approved FLSA settlement agreement against New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp. and related defendants. The court granted judgment in the amount of $15,911.88, including the original settlement amount plus 10% monthly penalties for defendants' failure to make timely payments.
What This Ruling Means
Court Ruling Summary: Romero v. New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp.
What Happened
Marcos Romero won a previous lawsuit against New Blue Flowers Gourmet Corp. for wage theft—when an employer illegally fails to pay workers what they're owed. The court had approved a settlement agreement requiring the company to pay him a certain amount. However, the company didn't pay on time as promised.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with Romero and ordered the company to pay $15,911.88. This amount included the original settlement plus additional penalties. Because the company delayed payment, the judge added a 10% monthly penalty on top of the original amount owed.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that court orders aren't just suggestions—employers must follow them. If a company ignores a settlement agreement, workers can go back to court and recover not only what they're owed but also extra penalties. This gives workers a stronger tool to enforce their rights when employers try to avoid paying settlements.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.