Skip to main content

Hong v. JP White Plains, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.March 31, 2021No. 7:19-cv-05018
Plaintiff WinJP White Plains, Inc.$1,107.25 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Hong prevailed on claims for compensatory and punitive damages. The court affirmed the judgment as modified, with plaintiff receiving $607.25 in compensatory damages and $500 in punitive damages after the defendant filed a remittitur reducing the originally awarded amounts.

What This Ruling Means

**Hong v. JP White Plains, Inc. - Employment Law Ruling** **What Happened:** An employee named Hong filed a lawsuit against JP White Plains, Inc. for employment law violations. While the specific details of the workplace dispute aren't provided in the excerpt, Hong successfully proved their case and was originally awarded a larger sum in damages. **What the Court Decided:** The court ultimately awarded Hong a total of $1,107.25 - consisting of $607.25 in compensatory damages (money to cover actual losses) and $500 in punitive damages (money meant to punish the employer's bad behavior). However, this final amount was lower than what Hong was initially awarded. The employer agreed to accept this reduced amount rather than face the possibility of a new trial, which could have resulted in higher damages. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that employees can successfully hold employers accountable for workplace violations and recover both actual damages and additional punishment damages. However, it also demonstrates that damage awards can be reduced during the appeals process. Workers should understand that even when they win their case, the final amount they receive might be negotiated down from the original judgment.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.