Jimenez v. ABC Food Center, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties reached a settlement in principle in this Fair Labor Standards Act overtime wage case. The court ordered the parties to submit the settlement agreement by July 30, 2021, for judicial approval to ensure fairness and reasonableness under applicable standards.
What This Ruling Means
Jimenez v. ABC Food Center, Inc. — Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee named Jimenez filed a lawsuit against ABC Food Center, Inc., claiming the company failed to pay proper overtime wages. The case was handled in federal court in New York and involved questions about whether the employer followed federal wage laws when compensating workers for extra hours.
The Court's Decision
Rather than proceed to trial, the two sides agreed to settle the dispute. The court ordered both parties to finalize and submit their settlement agreement by July 30, 2021, so a judge could review it and confirm the deal was fair to the worker.
Why This Matters
This case illustrates that workers can successfully challenge employers over overtime pay issues. Even without a public judgment showing specific damages, the settlement indicates the worker had a valid claim worth resolving. It reinforces that federal overtime laws protect employees, and companies may face legal consequences for underpaying workers for hours beyond the standard 40-hour workweek.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.