No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties reached a settlement of this Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour case. The settlement requires approval by the district judge pursuant to Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
Wage Theft Case Against Deli Owner
This case involved a worker named Ortiz Ochoa who sued Prince Deli Grocery Corp for wage theft and violations of federal wage and hour laws. Ochoa claimed the deli owner failed to pay proper wages as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets minimum wage and overtime rules for most workers in the United States.
The court records show this was a dispute over unpaid wages, but the specific outcome of the case is not available in the public documents. No damage amounts were reported, which could mean the case was settled out of court, dismissed, or is still pending.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights how workers can use federal labor laws to fight wage theft. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees the right to receive at least minimum wage and overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours per week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages. Even small businesses like delis and grocery stores must follow these federal wage laws, and workers have legal options when employers fail to pay what they owe.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Ortiz Ochoa v. Prince Deli Grocery Corp. from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.