No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court approved a settlement agreement totaling $45,000 (including attorney's fees and costs) to resolve Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law claims alleging wage and overtime violations. The settlement was found reasonable despite the plaintiffs' claimed damages of approximately $174,344.
Pizza Worker Sues Over Unpaid Wages
A worker named De Los Santos filed a lawsuit against Hat Trick Pizza, Inc. in federal court in New York's Southern District in September 2021. The case involved allegations of wage theft, meaning the employee claimed the pizza company failed to pay proper wages that were legally owed.
Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail to determine what specific wage violations were alleged or how the court ultimately ruled in this case. Wage theft cases typically involve issues like unpaid overtime, failure to pay minimum wage, or not compensating workers for all hours worked.
What This Means for Workers
Even without knowing the outcome, this case highlights an important right that all workers have: the ability to take legal action when employers don't pay proper wages. Federal and state wage laws protect workers from various forms of wage theft, and employees can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages. If you believe your employer has violated wage laws, you may have legal options available, including filing complaints with labor departments or pursuing court action to recover what you're owed.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.