No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties reached a settlement in this FLSA collective action wage case. The court issued an order requiring the parties to obtain court or DOL approval of the settlement agreement and submit it by October 15, 2021, along with documentation of fairness and reasonableness.
Andrew v. 64 Fulton St. Food Corp.: Fair Labor Standards Act Case
This case involved a worker named Andrew who sued his employer, 64 Fulton St. Food Corp., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets minimum wage requirements, overtime pay rules, and other basic workplace protections for most American workers.
While the specific details of Andrew's complaint aren't available from the court records, FLSA violations typically involve issues like not paying minimum wage, failing to pay overtime for hours worked beyond 40 per week, not keeping proper time records, or misclassifying employees to avoid paying required wages.
The final outcome of this case filed in 2021 is not known from the available information, and no damages were reported in the records.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that workers have legal protections under federal law regarding wages and working hours. If employees believe their employer isn't following wage and hour laws, they can file lawsuits to seek remedies. The FLSA gives workers important rights, and employers must comply with these federal standards regardless of state laws.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.