No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiffs prevailed on Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law claims. Following entry of default judgment against DT Hospitality Group, the court awarded damages totaling $423,864.56 to Carrera and $437,434.56 to Marquez, plus pre-judgment interest, post-judgment interest, attorneys' fees of $19,750, and costs of $570.
Nuno Carrera v. DT Hospitality Group Inc. - Employment Law Case Summary
What Happened:
Nuno Carrera filed a lawsuit against DT Hospitality Group Inc., claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of Carrera's complaints aren't provided in the available information, FLSA cases typically involve disputes over unpaid wages, missed overtime payments, or improper classification of workers.
What the Court Decided:
The outcome of this case is not available in the court records provided. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in December 2021, but the final decision and any damages awarded remain unknown.
Why This Matters for Workers:
FLSA cases are important because they protect workers' rights to fair pay. When employees successfully challenge wage violations, it can result in back pay, overtime compensation, and sometimes additional penalties for employers. These cases also remind employers that they must follow federal wage laws. Workers who believe their employer has violated wage and hour laws may have legal options, though each situation is unique and requires careful review.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Nuno Carrera v. DT Hospitality Group Inc. from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.