Skip to main content

Dominguez v. Metropolitan Wireless Anandpur Inc.

S.D.N.Y.February 11, 2022No. 1:21-cv-02240
Plaintiff WinMetropolitan Wireless Anandpur Inc.$55,737.2 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs for Fair Labor Standards Act violations and New York Labor Law violations including unpaid overtime, spread-of-hours wages, and statutory damages. Plaintiffs awarded damages ranging from $16,592.56 to $21,958.06 plus pre- and post-judgment interest.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Case Summary: Dominguez v. Metropolitan Wireless Anandpur Inc.** **What Happened:** An employee named Dominguez filed a lawsuit against Metropolitan Wireless Anandpur Inc. in federal court in New York in February 2022. The case involved alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. The FLSA requires employers to pay workers at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked over 40 in a week. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, there is insufficient information available about how this case was resolved. The court records don't show the final outcome or whether any damages were awarded to the worker. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights that workers have legal protections under federal wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives employees the right to file lawsuits when employers fail to pay proper wages or overtime. Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it demonstrates that workers can take legal action against companies that violate wage and hour requirements, regardless of the company's size or industry.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.