Skip to main content

Briggs v. DPV Transportation, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.February 23, 2022No. 7:21-cv-06738
SettlementDPV Transportation, Inc.$26,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court approved a class-action settlement whereby DPV Transportation agreed to pay $26,000 to resolve Fair Labor Standards Act and New York wage-and-hour claims brought by two employees (Antwine and Briggs) for unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, and statutory penalties for failure to provide wage notices and statements.

What This Ruling Means

**Briggs v. DPV Transportation: Wage and Hour Dispute** This case involved a worker named Briggs who sued DPV Transportation, Inc. for wage theft and violations of federal wage and hour laws. Briggs claimed that the transportation company failed to pay proper wages as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets minimum wage and overtime rules for most American workers. The case was filed in federal court in New York in February 2022. However, the final outcome of this lawsuit is not publicly available, as it requires access to the complete court judgment to determine how the case was resolved. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the final result, this case highlights an important right that workers have. The Fair Labor Standards Act allows employees to sue their employers when they believe they haven't been paid correctly. This includes situations where workers don't receive minimum wage, aren't paid for all hours worked, or don't get proper overtime pay. Transportation workers, like those in many industries, are protected by these federal wage laws and can take legal action when employers violate their pay rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.