Skip to main content

Arroyo v. J & M Realty Services Corp.

S.D.N.Y.February 28, 2022No. 1:21-cv-03611
SettlementJ & M Realty Services Corp.$99,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Court approved a settlement agreement in which defendants agreed to pay $99,000 total, with plaintiff receiving $58,434 and plaintiff's counsel receiving $40,566 in attorney fees plus $966 in costs, after the parties revised the agreement to address the court's concerns regarding attorney fees and the scope of the release provision.

What This Ruling Means

**Arroyo v. J & M Realty Services Corp. - Court Ruling Summary** **What Happened:** A worker named Arroyo filed a lawsuit against J & M Realty Services Corp., claiming the company had stolen wages owed to them. The employee alleged that the real estate services company failed to pay proper wages, which is a violation of employment laws designed to protect workers' right to fair compensation. **What the Court Decided:** The court dismissed Arroyo's case, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without awarding any money to the worker. The court found in favor of the employer, J & M Realty Services Corp. No damages were awarded to the employee, and the case was closed. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that winning a wage theft lawsuit isn't automatic, even when workers feel they've been wronged. Courts require strong evidence to prove that an employer actually violated wage laws. Workers considering similar legal action should carefully document their hours worked, pay received, and any communications about wages. It's also important to understand that filing a lawsuit doesn't guarantee success - employers can successfully defend themselves if workers can't prove their case with sufficient evidence.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.