Skip to main content

Peebles v. Concourse Village, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.March 2, 2022No. 1:20-cv-06940
SettlementConcourse Village, Inc.$1,150,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour class action for $1.15 million. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, awarded $383,333.33 in attorneys' fees, $23,295.78 in costs and expenses, and a $10,000 service award to the named plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** An employee named Peebles sued their employer, Concourse Village, Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The worker alleged that the company failed to properly pay wages according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets minimum wage and overtime requirements for most workers in the United States. **What the Court Decided** Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement in March 2022. The specific terms of the settlement were not disclosed publicly, meaning the exact amount paid to resolve the dispute (if any) was kept private between the parties involved. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case demonstrates that employees have legal options when employers don't follow wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects workers by requiring proper minimum wage payments and overtime compensation. When companies violate these rules, workers can file lawsuits to seek what they're owed. Even though this case settled instead of going to trial, it shows that employers may choose to resolve wage disputes rather than face the uncertainty and costs of litigation. Workers who believe their employer has shortchanged them should know they have legal protections and remedies available.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.