No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties settled a Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage-and-hour class action for $1.15 million. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable, awarded $383,333.33 in attorneys' fees, $23,295.78 in costs and expenses, and a $10,000 service award to the named plaintiff.
What Happened
An employee named Peebles sued their employer, Concourse Village, Inc., claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The worker alleged that the company failed to properly pay wages according to the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets minimum wage and overtime requirements for most workers in the United States.
What the Court Decided
Rather than going to trial, both sides reached a settlement agreement in March 2022. The specific terms of the settlement were not disclosed publicly, meaning the exact amount paid to resolve the dispute (if any) was kept private between the parties involved.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that employees have legal options when employers don't follow wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects workers by requiring proper minimum wage payments and overtime compensation. When companies violate these rules, workers can file lawsuits to seek what they're owed. Even though this case settled instead of going to trial, it shows that employers may choose to resolve wage disputes rather than face the uncertainty and costs of litigation. Workers who believe their employer has shortchanged them should know they have legal protections and remedies available.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Peebles from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.