Skip to main content

Rodriguez Pastor v. Harlem 421 Food Corp.

S.D.N.Y.March 30, 2022No. 1:21-cv-11120
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
settlement

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour case. The court issued an order directing the parties to follow one of three procedures for finalizing the settlement, including seeking judicial approval under Rule 41(a)(2), filing a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice with certification, or submitting an offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.

What This Ruling Means

**Rodriguez Pastor v. Harlem 421 Food Corp: Employment Law Case Summary** **What Happened:** Rodriguez Pastor filed a lawsuit against Harlem 421 Food Corp, claiming the company violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. While specific details about the alleged violations aren't provided, FLSA cases typically involve disputes over unpaid wages, overtime compensation, or improper classification of workers. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not yet determined or publicly available. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in March 2022, but the final resolution remains unknown. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights workers' rights to pursue legal action when they believe their employer has violated federal wage and hour laws. The FLSA gives employees important protections, including the right to receive proper overtime pay and minimum wage. When workers suspect violations, they can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages and seek other remedies. Even though this particular case's outcome is unclear, it demonstrates that workers have legal options when facing potential wage theft or other FLSA violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.