Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a Fair Labor Standards Act settlement agreement providing $12,000 in total recovery to plaintiffs (representing more than 100% of back wages owed), with $4,413 awarded for attorneys' fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp.
What Happened
Workers employed by 658-660 Amsterdam Corp. sued their employer for wage theft—failing to pay them the wages they earned. More than 100 employees were affected by this practice.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement that provided $12,000 in total compensation to the workers. Notably, this amount exceeded the back wages the employees actually lost, meaning they received additional recovery beyond what they were originally owed. The court also awarded $4,413 to cover the workers' attorneys' fees and legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that wage theft violations can result in meaningful financial recovery. When employers fail to pay workers properly, employees can take legal action and recover not just their lost wages but potentially additional damages. The court's approval of attorney's fees is also important because it means workers don't have to pay their lawyers out of pocket, making it more affordable to pursue wage claims. This settlement sends a message that wage theft has serious financial consequences for employers.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Montalvo Candia v. 658-660 Amsterdam Corp. from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.