Skip to main content

Javier Ortiz v. Madrid Bakery LLC

S.D.N.Y.May 9, 2022No. 1:21-cv-09630
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The court issued an order directing the parties to proceed through one of three approved mechanisms for dismissing FLSA claims: judicial approval under Rule 41(a)(2), stipulation of dismissal without prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), or offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68.

What This Ruling Means

**Javier Ortiz v. Madrid Bakery LLC: Employment Law Case Summary** **What Happened:** Javier Ortiz filed a lawsuit against Madrid Bakery LLC in federal court in New York, claiming the bakery violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. While the specific details of Ortiz's complaint aren't provided, FLSA violations typically involve issues like unpaid overtime, being paid below minimum wage, or improper classification of workers. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not available in the provided information, so it's unclear how the court ruled or whether the case was settled out of court. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights workers' rights to fair pay under federal law. The FLSA protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked over 40 in a week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages. Even when case outcomes aren't publicly known, these lawsuits serve as important reminders that workers have legal protections and can take action when employers don't follow wage and hour laws.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.