Skip to main content

Kassman v. KPMG LLP

S.D.N.Y.June 8, 2022No. 1:11-cv-03743
Defendant WinKPMG LLP
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The district court granted KPMG's motion to dismiss the Equal Pay Act claim for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff failed to adequately allege that she performed substantially equal work to identified male comparators, a required element of an EPA claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Kassman v. KPMG LLP: Employment Discrimination Case Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Kassman who filed a discrimination lawsuit against the accounting firm KPMG LLP. The employee claimed they faced illegal discrimination in the workplace, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not provided in the available information. The federal court in New York's Southern District dismissed the case in June 2022. When a court dismisses a case, it means the lawsuit was thrown out and the employee did not win. No damages were awarded to the worker, meaning they received no money from their employer. **What This Means for Workers:** This case shows that simply filing a discrimination claim doesn't guarantee success in court. Workers need strong evidence to prove their discrimination claims. When cases get dismissed, it often means the court found the evidence insufficient or that legal requirements weren't met. For employees considering discrimination lawsuits, this highlights the importance of documenting workplace issues thoroughly and potentially consulting with employment attorneys early. While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers still have legal protections against workplace discrimination - but proving these claims in court requires meeting specific legal standards and having solid evidence to support their case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.