Skip to main content

Rahman v. July 96 Corp.

S.D.N.Y.June 14, 2022No. 1:21-cv-09649
SettlementJuly 96 Corp.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court approved a settlement between the plaintiffs and defendants in this Fair Labor Standards Act case, pending submission of contemporaneous billing records supporting the plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees by June 17, 2022.

What This Ruling Means

**Rahman v. July 96 Corp.: Wage Law Violation Case** This case involved a worker named Rahman who sued their employer, July 96 Corp., claiming the company violated federal wage laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections. Rahman alleged that July 96 Corp. failed to follow these requirements, though the specific details of how the company violated the law are not available in the court records. The case was filed in federal court in New York's Southern District in June 2022. Unfortunately, the outcome of this lawsuit is not known from the available information, so it's unclear whether Rahman won or lost, or if the parties reached a settlement. **What This Means for Workers:** Even without knowing the final result, this case shows that workers have the right to challenge employers who don't follow federal wage laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees from wage theft, unpaid overtime, and below-minimum-wage pay. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file lawsuits in federal court to seek the wages they're owed, regardless of their employer's size or industry.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.