Skip to main content

Cruz v. East 168 Realty LLC

S.D.N.Y.July 29, 2022No. 1:21-cv-02079
SettlementEast 168 Realty LLC$60,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The parties reached a settlement in this FLSA wage-and-hour case. The plaintiff received $60,000, with one-third allocated to attorney's fees and costs. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable and dismissed the case with prejudice.

What This Ruling Means

**Cruz v. East 168 Realty LLC: Employment Law Case Summary** This case involved a worker named Cruz who filed a lawsuit against East 168 Realty LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The dispute centered on alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. Workers in real estate and property management companies sometimes face issues with unpaid overtime, improper wage calculations, or being misclassified as exempt from overtime requirements. The court's final decision in this case is not available from the current records, so the outcome remains unclear. No monetary damages have been reported at this time. This case matters for workers because FLSA violations are common across many industries, including real estate and property management. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees' right to receive proper wages and overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours per week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these wage and hour laws have the right to file complaints and seek compensation for unpaid wages. Even when case outcomes aren't immediately known, these lawsuits help establish important precedents for workplace rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.