No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties reached a settlement in this FLSA wage-and-hour case. The plaintiff received $60,000, with one-third allocated to attorney's fees and costs. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable and dismissed the case with prejudice.
Cruz v. East 168 Realty LLC: Employment Law Case Summary
This case involved a worker named Cruz who filed a lawsuit against East 168 Realty LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The dispute centered on alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace protections. Workers in real estate and property management companies sometimes face issues with unpaid overtime, improper wage calculations, or being misclassified as exempt from overtime requirements.
The court's final decision in this case is not available from the current records, so the outcome remains unclear. No monetary damages have been reported at this time.
This case matters for workers because FLSA violations are common across many industries, including real estate and property management. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees' right to receive proper wages and overtime pay when they work more than 40 hours per week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these wage and hour laws have the right to file complaints and seek compensation for unpaid wages. Even when case outcomes aren't immediately known, these lawsuits help establish important precedents for workplace rights.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Cruz from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.