Gonzalez v. Raguboy Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties reached a settlement agreement in this Fair Labor Standards Act case. The court issued an order requiring the parties to either consent to magistrate judge proceedings or submit a joint letter with settlement details for court approval by October 6, 2022.
What This Ruling Means
Gonzalez v. Raguboy Corp. Settlement Summary
What Happened
An employee named Gonzalez filed a lawsuit against Raguboy Corp., claiming the company failed to pay wages properly under federal labor laws. This type of violation is called wage theft, and it occurs when employers don't compensate workers correctly for time worked.
What the Court Decided
Rather than go to trial, both sides agreed to settle the case. The court required them to either accept a simpler hearing process before a magistrate judge or provide written details of their settlement agreement for final court approval by October 6, 2022. No specific damages amount was publicly disclosed.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that wage theft lawsuits can be resolved through settlement, even in federal court. Workers who believe their employer has underpaid them have legal options available. While this particular settlement didn't report public damages, it demonstrates that companies can be held accountable when workers challenge improper pay practices. Workers facing similar situations should consider documenting their hours and pay records.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.