Abundiz Carranza v. VBFS, Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a revised settlement agreement in this Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law wage theft case for $200,000, with plaintiff receiving $133,044.02 and plaintiff's counsel receiving $66,955.98 in fees and costs.
What This Ruling Means
Abundiz Carranza v. VBFS, Inc. Settlement Summary
What Happened
Abundiz Carranza brought a lawsuit against VBFS, Inc., claiming the company unlawfully withheld wages from employees. The case involved violations of federal wage laws (Fair Labor Standards Act) and New York state wage laws.
What the Court Decided
The court approved a settlement agreement requiring VBFS, Inc. to pay $200,000 total. Carranza received $133,044.02 in damages for unpaid wages. The remaining $66,955.98 covered attorney fees and legal costs.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case reinforces that employers cannot illegally hold back wages they owe. When companies violate wage laws, workers can pursue legal action to recover what they're entitled to earn. The settlement shows courts take wage theft seriously and will order employers to compensate affected employees. If you believe your employer hasn't paid you fairly, this ruling demonstrates workers have legal protections available.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
More Rulings in This Case
Other orders and opinions in Abundiz Carranza v. VBFS, Inc. from the same court.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.