Bao v. Sunwoo Trade Inc.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- summary judgment
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment, dismissing the plaintiff's FLSA and NYLL wage-and-hour claims, finding insufficient evidence that the plaintiff worked the claimed 76 hours per week and that the compensation paid met minimum wage requirements based on a 40-hour workweek assumption.
What This Ruling Means
Bao v. Sunwoo Trade Inc. - Case Summary
What Happened
An employee named Bao sued Sunwoo Trade Inc., claiming the company failed to pay minimum wage and didn't provide reasonable workplace accommodations. Bao argued he worked 76 hours per week but wasn't paid fairly for those extra hours.
What the Court Decided
The court sided with the employer and dismissed the case. The judge found that Bao didn't present enough evidence to prove he actually worked those 76 hours weekly. The court determined that based on a standard 40-hour workweek, the wages Bao received met minimum wage requirements. Because of this, the wage theft claim failed.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that workers bringing wage-and-hour claims need strong documentation of their actual hours worked. Simply claiming you worked long weeks isn't enough—you need records, timesheets, or other concrete evidence to prove your hours. Workers should keep detailed records of when they work, especially if they believe they're owed extra pay. Without this documentation, it becomes difficult to win wage disputes in court.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.