Skip to main content

Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation

S.D.N.Y.December 29, 2022No. 1:21-cv-07549
Defendant WinNassau County Department of Social Services
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateRetaliation

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment for the employer on all federal claims. The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the employer denied her a reasonable accommodation for her disability and failed to establish the required adverse employment action for her retaliation claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Storch v. 2 East 70th Street Corporation: Court Rules Against Worker in Disability Case** This case involved a worker who sued Nassau County Department of Social Services, claiming her employer failed to provide reasonable accommodations for her disability and retaliated against her for requesting help. The employee argued that her workplace didn't make necessary adjustments to help her do her job despite her disability, and that she faced punishment for speaking up about her needs. The court ruled entirely in favor of the employer. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision, finding that the worker couldn't prove her employer actually denied her reasonable accommodations. Additionally, the court determined she failed to show that any negative employment action was taken against her in retaliation for her requests. **What this means for workers:** This case highlights how challenging it can be to win disability accommodation and retaliation lawsuits. Workers must provide strong, specific evidence that their employer refused reasonable accommodations and that they suffered concrete negative consequences (like demotion, firing, or reduced hours) for requesting help. Simply feeling mistreated isn't enough - courts require clear proof of denied accommodations and measurable retaliation. Workers should document all accommodation requests and any subsequent workplace changes carefully.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.