Skip to main content

Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC.

S.D.N.Y.January 31, 2023No. 1:10-cv-06950
SettlementGoldman, Sachs & Co. LLC$215,000,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Settlement reached in class action litigation

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Goldman Sachs settled gender discrimination claims brought by female employees alleging systemic pay and promotion disparities in a class action employment discrimination case.

What This Ruling Means

**Goldman Sachs Settles Major Gender Discrimination Case for $215 Million** Female employees at Goldman Sachs filed a class action lawsuit claiming the investment bank systematically discriminated against women in pay and promotions. The women alleged they were paid less than their male colleagues and passed over for advancement opportunities because of their gender, creating an unfair workplace where men received better treatment across the board. Rather than go to trial, Goldman Sachs agreed to settle the case in January 2023 for $215 million. This settlement money will be distributed among the female employees who were part of the lawsuit. By settling, Goldman Sachs avoided admitting wrongdoing but agreed to pay substantial damages to resolve the claims. This case matters for workers because it demonstrates that employees can successfully challenge workplace discrimination, even against powerful employers. When workers band together in class action lawsuits, they can hold companies accountable for unfair treatment and win significant compensation. The large settlement amount sends a message to other employers that gender discrimination in pay and promotions can be very costly, potentially encouraging fairer workplace practices across different industries.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.