Skip to main content

Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC.

S.D.N.Y.August 24, 2020No. 1:10-cv-06950
SettlementGoldman, Sachs & Co. LLC$215,000,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Settlement reached in class action employment discrimination suit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Goldman Sachs settled a gender discrimination class action lawsuit brought by female employees, agreeing to pay $215 million to resolve claims of pay and promotion discrimination.

What This Ruling Means

**Goldman Sachs Gender Discrimination Settlement** Female employees at Goldman Sachs filed a class action lawsuit claiming the investment bank systematically discriminated against women. The workers alleged they were paid less than male colleagues doing similar work and were passed over for promotions because of their gender. This case, known as Chen-Oster v. Goldman Sachs, represented thousands of female employees who worked at the company. In August 2020, Goldman Sachs agreed to settle the lawsuit for $215 million without admitting wrongdoing. This was one of the largest gender discrimination settlements in Wall Street history. The money will be distributed among the female employees who were part of the class action lawsuit. This settlement matters for workers because it demonstrates that companies can face significant financial consequences for gender discrimination. It shows that employees can successfully challenge unfair treatment through class action lawsuits, even against powerful employers. The large settlement amount sends a strong message to other companies about the importance of ensuring equal pay and promotion opportunities for all employees, regardless of gender. Workers facing similar discrimination should know they have legal options to fight back.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.