Skip to main content

Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC.

S.D.N.Y.November 7, 2023No. 1:10-cv-06950
SettlementGoldman, Sachs & Co. LLC$215,000,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Settlement reached in Second Circuit (NYSD)

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

Goldman Sachs settled a gender discrimination class action lawsuit brought by female employees alleging systemic pay and promotion disparities.

What This Ruling Means

**Goldman Sachs Settles Major Gender Discrimination Case** Female employees at Goldman Sachs filed a class action lawsuit claiming the investment bank systematically paid women less and passed them over for promotions compared to their male colleagues. The women argued this created a workplace culture that discriminated against female workers across the company. The court case ended in November 2023 when Goldman Sachs agreed to settle for $215 million rather than continue fighting the lawsuit in court. This settlement represents one of the largest gender discrimination payouts in recent years. While Goldman Sachs did not admit wrongdoing, the company agreed to pay the substantial sum to resolve all claims. This settlement matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully challenge large corporations when they work together in class action lawsuits. The case demonstrates that companies may face significant financial consequences for alleged pay gaps and promotion practices that favor one gender over another. For female workers especially, this ruling reinforces that systematic workplace discrimination can be legally challenged, even against powerful employers. The large settlement amount also sends a message to other companies about the potential costs of discriminatory practices.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.