Skip to main content

Recio v. D'Almonte Enterprises Parking Garage, Inc.

S.D.N.Y.July 5, 2023No. 1:22-cv-06153
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed that petitioners were entitled to prevailing wages under Labor Law section 220 based on their classification in the competitive class by the municipal civil service commission.

What This Ruling Means

**Parking Garage Workers Win Wage Case** This case involved parking garage workers employed by D'Almonte Enterprises who claimed they weren't being paid the wages they were legally entitled to receive. The workers argued that because they were classified as competitive class employees by the municipal civil service commission, they should have been receiving higher "prevailing wages" under New York Labor Law section 220. The court ruled in favor of the workers, agreeing that they were indeed entitled to these higher prevailing wages based on their employment classification. The judge affirmed that the civil service commission's classification of these employees meant the employer was required to pay prevailing wage rates, not lower wages. **What This Means for Workers:** This decision reinforces that employers cannot shortchange workers on wages when specific legal requirements apply to their jobs. If you work in a position covered by prevailing wage laws - often jobs connected to government contracts or public work - your employer must pay the legally required wage rates, not whatever they choose to pay. Workers in similar situations should know they have legal protections and can challenge employers who try to pay less than what the law requires.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.