Canela v. JMF Restaurant Corp
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The court approved a settlement agreement for $43,400 in which the plaintiff recovered $28,933.66 for unpaid minimum wages and overtime under the FLSA and New York Labor Law, representing approximately 37% of her claimed $77,265 in damages.
What This Ruling Means
Canela v. JMF Restaurant Corp
What Happened
An employee at JMF Restaurant Corp. claimed the company failed to pay her the minimum wage and overtime pay she was owed. She sued under federal and New York state wage laws, seeking approximately $77,265 in unpaid compensation.
The Court's Decision
The case was settled rather than decided at trial. The employer agreed to pay $43,400 total. Of this amount, the employee received $28,933.66 for unpaid minimum wages and overtime—which represented about 37% of the damages she originally claimed.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case shows that wage theft claims can result in payment recovery, though often less than the full amount owed. Workers who believe they haven't been paid properly for hours worked can take legal action. However, settlements may involve compromises where employees receive partial compensation. This case demonstrates that both federal wage laws and New York state protections are available tools for workers to recover unpaid wages, though the process can be lengthy and the final payment may be reduced from initial claims.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.