Skip to main content

Lemus v. Pezzementi

S.D.N.Y.September 29, 2023No. 7:15-cv-05592
Plaintiff WinNorthen Tree Service$68,260.55 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

Plaintiff Ramiro Lemus prevailed on default judgment against Todd Pezzementi and Northen Tree Service. The court adopted the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, awarding plaintiff damages for unpaid overtime wages, unpaid wages, liquidated damages, medical expenses, pain and suffering, costs, and punitive damages.

What This Ruling Means

Lemus v. Pezzementi: Court Rules for Worker on Wage and Job Loss Claims

What Happened

Ramiro Lemus worked for Northen Tree Service and its owner Todd Pezzementi. Lemus claimed his employer failed to pay him overtime wages and regular wages owed to him. He also alleged he was wrongfully fired from his job.

What the Court Decided

The court sided completely with Lemus and awarded him $68,260.55 in damages. This payment covers unpaid overtime, unpaid regular wages, additional penalties, medical expenses, pain and suffering, court costs, and punitive damages (extra money to punish the employer for wrongdoing).

Why This Matters for Workers

This case shows that workers who aren't paid properly—especially overtime pay—can take their employers to court and win significant compensation. The court's decision reinforces that employers cannot ignore wage laws without consequences. If you believe your employer owes you unpaid wages or fired you unfairly, this case demonstrates that the legal system can hold employers accountable and provide meaningful financial recovery.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Lemus from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.