Swanson v. Two 7 Three Kitchen Corp.
Case Details
- Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
- Labor: Fair Standards
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Unknown
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- consent decree
- State
- New York
- Circuit
- Second Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The parties settled their Fair Labor Standards Act wage-and-hour dispute. The Court ordered them to submit by January 16, 2024, either a Rule 68 offer of judgment or a joint motion seeking judicial approval of the settlement, along with required documentation including the settlement agreement, attorneys' fee records, and supporting materials.
What This Ruling Means
Swanson v. Two 7 Three Kitchen Corp. — Case Summary
What Happened
An employee named Swanson filed a wage-theft case against Two 7 Three Kitchen Corp., claiming the restaurant failed to properly pay wages according to federal labor laws. The lawsuit centered on whether the employer violated rules requiring fair pay for hours worked.
What the Court Decided
Rather than going to trial, both sides agreed to settle the dispute. The court approved this settlement process, requiring the parties to submit their agreement and related documents by January 16, 2024. No specific damages amount was publicly reported.
Why This Matters for Workers
This case demonstrates that workers can challenge employers who don't pay fairly, and disputes can be resolved through settlement. While the final settlement amount remained private, the case shows the court system takes wage-theft claims seriously. Workers facing similar pay problems should know they have legal options to pursue claims against their employers for unpaid wages.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.