Skip to main content

Crawford v. Leeding Builders Group, LLC

S.D.N.Y.February 8, 2024No. 1:23-cv-07290
Mixed ResultLeidos Constructors, LLC$7,384,863 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage Theft

Outcome

The circuit court awarded Global Industrial partial judgment for unpaid invoices totaling $7,384,863 and foreclosed on its materialmen's lien, but the Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed and remanded on the issue of whether the lien was properly perfected due to insufficient property description.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a construction worker named Crawford who sued Leeding Builders Group for unpaid wages and contract violations. Crawford claimed the company failed to pay him properly for work performed and breached their employment agreement. The court reached a mixed decision. While specific details about Crawford's individual claims aren't provided in the excerpt, the case appears to be part of a larger construction dispute involving Global Industrial, which was awarded $7.38 million for unpaid invoices. However, the Arkansas Court of Appeals later overturned part of this decision, sending it back to the lower court because of problems with how a property lien was filed. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can successfully pursue legal action when employers don't pay wages or honor contracts. Even though the appeals process can be complicated and outcomes may be mixed, workers have legal protections against wage theft and contract breaches. The significant dollar amounts involved demonstrate that courts take these violations seriously. However, the case also illustrates that legal proceedings can be lengthy and complex, especially when multiple parties and property interests are involved. Workers facing similar issues should document their work and pay carefully to strengthen potential claims.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.