No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The parties settled the FLSA wage-and-hour case for $150,000, with $100,050 allocated to the plaintiff and $49,950 in attorney's fees and costs. The court approved the settlement as fair and reasonable.
Collado v. 216 Realty Associates LLC: Employment Standards Dispute
This case involved a worker named Collado who filed a lawsuit against their employer, 216 Realty Associates LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Collado alleged that the real estate company failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which sets rules about minimum wage, overtime pay, and other basic workplace protections.
The court case was filed in February 2024 in the Southern District of New York federal court. However, based on the available information, the final outcome of this dispute cannot be determined. The case appears to be either still ongoing or resolved without sufficient public details about how it concluded.
What This Means for Workers:
This case highlights that employees have the right to challenge employers who don't follow federal wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects workers by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime compensation for hours worked beyond 40 per week. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file federal lawsuits to seek proper compensation and hold companies accountable for following basic labor standards.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Other orders and opinions in Collado from the same court.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.