Skip to main content

Mazroue v. Cigarillos 4 Corporation

S.D.N.Y.May 7, 2024No. 1:23-cv-09056
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The petition for writ of mandamus was denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Mazroue v. Cigarillos 4 Corporation: Employment Dispute Results in Denied Legal Request** **What Happened** An employee named Mazroue had a workplace dispute with Cigarillos 4 Corporation and went to federal court seeking help. The worker filed what's called a "petition for writ of mandamus" - essentially asking the court to order someone (likely a government agency or another court) to take a specific action related to their employment situation. However, the available court records don't provide enough detail to understand the exact nature of the underlying workplace problem. **What the Court Decided** The federal court denied Mazroue's petition. This means the court refused to issue the order the worker was seeking. No money damages were awarded in this case. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights that workers have limited options when trying to force courts or government agencies to take action on employment matters. A writ of mandamus is a rarely-granted legal tool that courts use very sparingly. Workers facing employment disputes should understand that while they can petition courts for various types of relief, success isn't guaranteed, and the specific legal strategy matters greatly in employment cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.