Skip to main content

Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits v. Paschal, Bihn & Sons, LLC

S.D. OhioOctober 1, 2019No. 2:19-cv-03454
Plaintiff WinPaschal, Bihn & Sons, LLC$4,134.22 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers Benefits obtained default judgment against Paschal, Bihn & Sons, LLC for unpaid fringe benefit contributions under ERISA and LMRA. The court awarded $1,584.22 in unpaid contributions, liquidated damages, and interest, plus $2,550.00 in attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**Ohio Construction Company Ordered to Pay Unpaid Employee Benefits** This case involved a construction company, Paschal, Bihn & Sons, LLC, that failed to pay required benefit contributions for their workers. The Ohio Laborers Benefits fund, which manages health insurance and other benefits for union construction workers, sued the company for not making the payments they were legally required to contribute on behalf of their employees. The court ruled in favor of the benefits fund because the company failed to respond to the lawsuit. The judge awarded a total of $4,134.22, which included $1,584.22 in unpaid benefit contributions plus interest and penalties, and an additional $2,550 to cover the legal costs of pursuing the case. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that employers cannot simply ignore their legal obligation to pay into employee benefit funds. When companies fail to make required contributions to health insurance, pension, or other benefit programs, workers can lose important protections. Courts will enforce these payment requirements and can make employers pay penalties and legal fees on top of what they originally owed, ensuring workers don't lose benefits they've earned.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.