Skip to main content

International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 413 v. The Kroger Co.

S.D. OhioFebruary 9, 2021No. 2:19-cv-03513
Mixed ResultThe Kroger Co.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Ohio

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court denied Defendant's motion for summary judgment and granted in part Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, finding the grievance concerning retirement benefit distribution options is arbitrable under the collective bargaining agreement.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a labor dispute between the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 413 and grocery giant Kroger. The union and the company had disagreements related to their working relationship and labor management issues, though the specific details of what sparked the conflict are not provided in the available information. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning in this case are not included in the summary provided. Without knowing how the judge ruled or what legal principles were applied, it's impossible to determine which side prevailed or what specific issues were resolved. **What this means for workers:** Labor disputes between unions and employers are common and can cover a wide range of workplace issues - from wages and benefits to working conditions and job security. When these disagreements can't be resolved through negotiations, they often end up in court. The outcome of such cases can set important precedents for how similar disputes are handled in the future. Workers represented by unions should stay informed about major cases involving their union, as the results can directly impact their workplace rights and protections. Even without knowing this specific outcome, the case shows that unions continue to actively represent workers' interests against large employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.