Skip to main content

Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Baseline Industrial Construction, Inc.

D. Or.November 26, 2019No. 3:19-cv-01343
Plaintiff WinBaseline Industrial Construction, Inc.$23,708.12 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
default judgment
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court entered default judgment against Defendant Baseline Industrial Construction for unpaid employee benefit plan contributions under ERISA and LMRA, awarding approximately $23,708.12 in contributions, liquidated damages, interest, audit fees, and attorney's fees. Default judgment against individual defendant Mark Aldridge was denied due to insufficient allegations of personal liability.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved a dispute between a union health and welfare trust fund and Baseline Industrial Construction, a company that employed union workers. The trust fund sued the company, claiming it failed to pay required contributions to the workers' health and welfare benefits fund as required under their collective bargaining agreement. The company allegedly violated federal ERISA laws, which protect employee benefit plans, and breached their union contract by not making these mandatory payments. **What the Court Decided** The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mixed ruling, meaning some parts favored the trust fund while others favored the construction company. The court focused on interpreting what the collective bargaining agreement actually required regarding employer contributions and clarified the company's specific obligations under ERISA law. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision is important because it helps define when employers must contribute to union benefit funds and what happens when they don't. Union workers depend on these employer contributions to fund their health insurance and welfare benefits. Clear court rulings like this help ensure companies follow through on their contractual obligations to pay into these essential benefit funds that protect workers and their families.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.