Skip to main content

Trustees of the U.A. Union Local No. 290 Plumber, Steamfitter and Shipfitter Industry Pension Trust v. Puddletown Plumbing LLC

D. Or.April 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00487
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Plaintiffs' motion to compel production of documents was denied as procedurally improper because the defendant was not properly served and the parties had not conducted a Rule 26(f) conference, making the motion premature.

What This Ruling Means

**Pension Contributions Dispute Between Union Trust and Plumbing Company** This case involved a dispute between a plumbers' union pension trust and Puddletown Plumbing LLC over required pension contributions. The union trust, which manages retirement benefits for union plumbers, steamfitters, and shipfitters, claimed that the plumbing company failed to make proper contributions to the pension fund as required under federal ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act) laws. The court's final decision in this case is not available from the provided information, so the outcome remains unclear. **What This Means for Workers:** This type of case highlights the importance of employer obligations to contribute to pension plans. When employers fail to make required pension contributions, it can jeopardize workers' retirement security. Union pension trusts often have to take legal action to ensure employers meet their obligations under collective bargaining agreements and federal law. Workers should be aware that if their employer participates in a pension plan, those contributions are legally required, not optional. If workers suspect their employer isn't making proper pension contributions, they can contact their union representative or the pension plan administrator to investigate.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.