Skip to main content

Munger v. Intel Corporation

D. Or.May 3, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00263
Plaintiff WinIntel Corporation
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment
State
Oregon

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, finding that defendant Tracy Cloud, who murdered the employee Philip Cloud, is barred from receiving his ERISA plan benefits under Oregon's slayer statute and federal common law. The benefits are to be distributed to Philip Cloud's estate.

What This Ruling Means

Munger v. Intel Corporation: Benefits Protection After Wrongful Death

What Happened
Philip Cloud, an Intel employee, was murdered by Tracy Cloud. After the death, a dispute arose over who should receive Philip's employee retirement benefits under Intel's ERISA retirement plan. Tracy Cloud claimed the benefits as the named beneficiary, but Philip's estate challenged this claim.

What the Court Decided
The court ruled against Tracy Cloud, finding that he could not receive the retirement benefits. Oregon's "slayer statute"—a law preventing people who commit crimes from profiting from those crimes—prevented him from collecting. The benefits instead went to Philip Cloud's estate, which would distribute them according to his will or state law.

Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling protects employee retirement benefits from going to someone who caused an employee's death. It ensures that company retirement plans respect basic justice principles and state laws designed to prevent criminals from benefiting from their crimes. Workers can feel confident that their carefully designated beneficiaries' interests are protected, and that illegal actions won't override the distribution of earned benefits.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Munger from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.