Skip to main content

Bliss-Miller v. Laborers International Union of North America Local 158

M.D. Pa.September 29, 2021No. 3:17-cv-01837-KM
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court found that the union discriminated against the plaintiff based on her gender by denying her job referrals and retaliated against her after she filed an EEOC complaint. The court awarded damages for lost wages and front pay.

What This Ruling Means

**Bliss-Miller v. Laborers International Union Case Summary** **What Happened:** A worker named Bliss-Miller filed a civil rights lawsuit against Laborers International Union of North America Local 158, claiming the union violated their employment-related civil rights. The case was filed in Pennsylvania federal court in September 2021. The specific details of what the worker alleged the union did wrong are not available from the court records provided. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this case is not known from the available information. The court records don't show whether the worker won or lost their case, or if the parties reached a settlement agreement outside of court. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case highlights that workers can take legal action against their own unions if they believe the union violated their civil rights in employment matters. Unions have legal obligations to treat members fairly and follow anti-discrimination laws, just like employers do. Workers who feel their union has discriminated against them or violated their civil rights have options to seek justice through the court system. However, these cases can be complex, and outcomes vary significantly based on the specific facts involved.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.